by | ARTICLES, ECONOMY, POLITICS
Poverty spending is up 41% since the start of the Obama administration, according to a recent study by the Cato Institute. The poverty rate remains at 15.1%, which is the same rate it was in 1965, when LBJ declared his “War on Poverty”.
The poverty rate since then has hovered in the 11-15% range since then; the only time it fell below 11% was a short time in the 1970s. In FY2008, federal anti-poverty spending totaled $475 billion dollars. For FY2011, spending was $668 billion in 126 anti-poverty programs.
According to Cato,
The study faults the way poverty programs are designed, saying that the increase in spending and largely unchanged poverty rate showed that the issue is not a matter of money, but a matter of what the programs aim to achieve.
“The vast majority of current programs are focused on making poverty more comfortable – giving poor people more food, better shelter, health care, and so forth – rather than giving people the tools that will help them escape poverty.”
Instead, the study recommends refocusing anti-poverty efforts on keeping people in school, discouraging out-of-wedlock births, and encouraging people to get a job – even if that job is a low-wage one.
Trillions in debt. Nearly 50% of taxpayers don’t pay federal taxes. Uptick in anti-poverty spending with no tangible results. What will Obama do next?
by | ARTICLES, ECONOMY, POLITICS, TAXES
Food stamps cost taxpayers $80 billion a year, but how those funds are spent by the recipient remains largely unknown
Food stamps can be spent on goods ranging from candy to steak and are accepted at retailers from gas stations that primarily sell potato chips to fried-chicken restaurants. And as the amount spent on food stamps has more than doubled in recent years, the amount of food stamps laundered into cash has increased dramatically, government statistics show.
Information regarding how and where the funds are distributed apparently can’t be released due to federal rules.
When a FOIA attempt was made to state officials in Maryland — the request was denied: “the information belonged to the federal government, which instructed states not to release it”. Furthermore, when the Washington Times inquired about how and where the food stamps funds are disbursed, the Times was offered the information — for $125,ooo. The USDA also keeps the program under tight wraps, and would not disclose any information.
The Washington Times concluded,
As a result, fraud is hard to track and the efficacy of the massive program is impossible to evaluate.
So there you have it — your tax dollars, unaccounted for. Surprised?
UPDATE: “>The USDA suggests Food Stamp Parties and games to increase participation
by | ECONOMY, FREEDOM
by | ECONOMY, OBAMACARE, POLITICS, TAXES
FLASHBACK: Don’t forget that the House voted to repeal the Medical Device Tax on June 7, 2012 with “H.R. 436, the Protect Medical Innovation Act of 2012”. The Senate never did — not then, not now. Who’s looking out for businesses? See my post from June 2012:
This little-talked about tax seems to be absent from news coverage. Are media outlets are avoiding discussion of Obamacare items in advance of the Supreme Court ruling expected later this month? In case you missed it, on June 7th, the House voted 270-146 to repeal the medical excise tax. The bill must now pass the Senate, where current speculation is that it will not pass.
What is the medical excise tax? Medical device manufacturers employ 360,000 people in 6000 plants across the country. This law imposes a new 2.3% excise tax. It exempts items retailing for <$100. [Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,980-1,986]
Many are ardently opposed to the new tax, and rightfully so. As an excise tax, it taxes gross sales – even if the device company doesn't turn a profit that year. Note: this tax is one of many slated to go into effect January 2013.
As a revenue raiser, its impact is nominal. The government speculates it could raise $20-$30 billion. Though that sounds like a lot to you and me, it's a drop in the bucket in terms of government revenue.
Furthermore, from an business perspective for the companies subject to this tax, the extra resources needed to comply will be burdensome for companies. Price changes and paperwork will take time and manpower away from the company's main purpose -- to produce a product -- in order to handle this new regulation.
From a common sense perspective, why would the federal government want to make medical devices -- which save lives -- more expensive? Will the Senate support small businesses and repeal an unnecessary, expensive, and burdonsome tax? The House has done so. The Senate should follow suit.
by | ECONOMY, FREEDOM, POLITICS, TAXES
From an article in the Washington Post:
The net worth of the American family has fallen to its lowest level in two decades, according to government data released Monday, driven by a more than 40 percent drop in their stakes in their homes.
The Federal Reserve’s detailed survey of consumer finances showed families’ median wealth plunged from $126,400 in 2007 to $77,300 in 2010 — a 39 percent decline. That put them on par with median wealth in 1992.
The Fed’s data underscore the depth of the wounds of the Great Recession and how far many families remain from healing. The median value of Americans’ debt did not change between 2007 and 2010. Meanwhile, the housing market crash inflicted particularly severe damage, with the Fed showing that the median value of Americans’ equity in their homes plunged 42.3 percent between 2007 and 2010.
The survey is conducted every three years, and this report offers one of the most exhaustive looks to date at the greatest economic upheaval in a generation. Although there have been some signs that the recovery has picked up steam — housing prices have begun to stabilize and unemployment has fallen — Fed economists said those improvements largely do not change the survey results.
“Recovery from the so-called Great Recession has also been particularly slow,” the Fed said in its report.
And yet, spending has increased at a greater rate than has even been seen in the history of this country. Spending, on the backs of the taxpayer. No wonder we are poorer. We are shouldering a staggering amount of federal debt.
by | ARTICLES, ECONOMY, POLITICS, TAXES
From the WSJ:
U.S. stocks posted their biggest losses of the year following another disappointing employment report.
The Dow industrials sank 274.88 points, or 2.2%, to 12118.57, turning negative for the year. The Nasdaq composite lost 79.86, or 2.8%, to 2747.48. The S&P 500 fell 32.29, or 2.5%, to 1278.04.
Gold prices shot up 3.7% to $1,620.50 a troy ounce. The yield on the 10-year Treasury note fell to 1.467%, its first time ever below 1.5%. Crude-oil slumped 3.8%. The dollar retreated against the euro and yen.
However, want some really sobering numbers?
Go down to International Stock Markets and start looking at their 1-yr % change.
Spain? 41.34% of their stock value GONE.
Italy? 36.84% of their stock value GONE.
France? 25.58% of their stock value GONE.
Britain? 11.27% of their stock value GONE.
Canada? 16.02% of their stock value GONE.
Argentina? 28.95% of their stock value GONE. (remember them? Right now they are denying devaluation speculation)
Hong Kong? 21.45% of their stock value GONE.
China? 13.49% of their stock value GONE.
Japan? 13.16% of their stock value GONE.
Israel? 15.03 of their stock value GONE.
Egypt? 15.15% of their stock value GONE. (didn’t they just have a revolution? On par with Israel…)
The U.S. Dow Jones? Down a mere 3.14%
I don’t think we’ve seen numbers such as these since the Great Depression or the fall of Rome. Worse, this is all being done on speculation on the Greek market’s impact on the Euro.
Two things:
(1) The world markets are tanking and that “full faith and credit of the United States” on your money is what’s keeping America afloat.
(2) You should be investing in precious metals if we don’t get a budget out of Congress by the end of the year. Not gold and silver, either… but copper and lead.
Between the federal statutory debt limit and the November Presidential elections, Autumn 2012 is certain to be just as volatile.
by | ARTICLES, ECONOMY, TAXES
Reports coming in this morning show the unemployment rate rising a tenth of a point, as only 69K jobs were added in May. If you count “discouraged workers”, their numbers went up as well — to 14.8%. Workforce participation continues to hover at 30 year lows.
Last month, analysts boasted hopeful spin numbers that the unemployment rate was 8.1% — forgetting to mention the part that it was because 341K had left the workforce. Now, what about the month of April, again?
The report comes a month after the government reported that just 115,000 new jobs were added in April, a number that helped contribute to a general malaise about economic growth.
Even that number was worse than thought: The BLS revised the April number down to 77,000.
Additionally, stocks were down their worst week since 2010. A quick look at pre-market data shows that they are spooked by the report as well this morning. Let’s see what Friday brings. At least for President Obama, he has six fundraiser to attend today!
Other opinions:
White House Blames Bush
Is a second recession on the way?
Jobs Slowdown Adds to Global Fears
by | BUSINESS, ECONOMY, HYPOCRISY, OBAMA, SOCIAL SECURITY, TAXES
USA Today had a spot-on analysis of how misleading federal accounting practices are. In a previous article elucidating how Social Security is not Pay-As-You-Go, I pointed out the fallacy of this “system”, as it is a method of hiding future realities. USA Today takes this concept further and examines the entirety of the government’s deficit reporting:
The big difference between the official deficit and standard accounting: Congress exempts itself from including the cost of promised retirement benefits. Yet companies, states and local governments must include retirement commitments in financial statements, as required by federal law and private boards that set accounting rules.
Exactly. Any business profession which failed to take into account future liabilities would face scrutiny from the SEC.
The main argument for exempting future retirement promises into the deficit calculation is that the government has the flexibility to change the amount it is obligated to pay out by tweaking the formula — such as raising taxes or cutting benefits — while businesses do not typically have that luxury. Such a ridiculous premise. The deficit amounts are always in flux and this excuse only serves to hide the reality of extra trillion dollar obligations that no one wants to fix, own up to, or reduce. A few days ago, I did some number crunching on the “official” federal deficit figures. I can’t fathom the results I’d get incorporating the data USA Today compiled.
From the USA Today findings:
•Social Security had the biggest financial slide. The government would need $22.2 trillion today, set aside and earning interest, to cover benefits promised to current workers and retirees beyond what taxes will cover. That’s $9.5 trillion more than was needed in 2004.
•Deficits from 2004 to 2011 would be six times the official total of $5.6 trillion reported.
•Federal debt and retiree commitments equal $561,254 per household. By contrast, an average household owes a combined $116,057 for mortgages, car loans and other debts.
With folks like Dick Durbin perpetuating the lie, it’s no wonder how ignorant much of the population is with regard to proper accounting practices and fiduciary responsibility.
by | ARTICLES, ECONOMY, OBAMA, POLITICS, TAXES
The folks over at CNS news had a little article about our current federal debt. They pointed out that federal debt is currently $15.709 trillion.
They went on to calculate that since March 4, 2011, the federal debt has increased $1,526,126,486,886.61.
The first spending deal the White House and leaders of both parties in Congress made last year was on March 2. On that day, the president signed a continuing resolution to keep the government funded past March 4, when the previous continuing resolution, passed by a lame-duck Congress in late 2010, expired.
The March 4 CR kept the government funded for two weeks and was approved by a bipartisan 335-91 vote in the House and a bipartisan 91-9 vote in the Senate.
Since that March 4, 2011 bipartisan continuing resolution, the federal government has been funded by a series of bipartisan deals cut between the White House and congressional leaders.
They further tabulated the debt per household since the first Continuing Resolution:
Given that the Census Bureau estimates there are about 117,538,000 households in the United States, the per household increase in the federal debt since Congress enacted its March 4, 2011 bipartisan spending deal has been approximately $12,984.
This got me thinking about some more facts and figures:
If the total debt it 15,709,000,000,000.00, and there are 117,538,000 households in the United States, each household is responsible for $133,650.39.
Given that the US Population Clock records that there are 313,582,673 persons in the United States as of today, each person is responsible for $50,095.24
Given that it is estimated that 46% of households either paid no federal income tax in 2011 or will receive more from the IRS than they pay in, that means 63,470,520 households (54%) did. If you divide the entire debt per taxpaying household, each is responsible for $247,500.72 of the total debt, or an increase of $24,044.65 since last March. (14 months ago)
The next statutory limit on our debt $16.394 trillion, so we’ve got another $685 billion to go. Some have estimated the debt limit will be reached before election day, around October 15. A February 2012 study by US Senator Rob Portman, former director of the OMB, has noted that,
“Following the contentious debt ceiling last August, President Obama promised that he would take action to address the country’s fiscal crisis. He has failed to do that. In fact, his new budget increases spending and projects that Washington will be hitting the debt ceiling again in mid-October – burning through a $2.1 trillion debt limit increase in just over 14 months. This is an unfortunate but clear signal to the American people that Washington is spending too much, borrowing too much, and putting our nation’s fiscal stability at risk.
So some final calculations here.
By around Election Day, the total debt of the United States will be $16,394,000,000,000.00 ($16.394 trillion).
Based on today’s (May 20th) population numbers,
That’s $55,279.67 per person
That’s $139,478.29 per household
That’s $258,293.14 per taxpaying household
Pretty sobering.
by | ECONOMY, POLITICS, TAXES
This one is really really going to work this time. I promise!
Last Saturday, Obama unveiled his new stimulus plan — a list of more things for the government to do in order to create new jobs. That means more government spending.
The president’s list includes an expanded program to help homeowners refinance their mortgages, a proposal to give small businesses tax breaks for hiring more workers, a program that would help veterans find jobs, and an extension of tax credits for clean-energy companies.
The Washington Times reports that the cost for this new stimulus plan could be nearly $35 billion. Additionally, much of the parts of this “plan” are recycled ideas from the proposed Jobs Package that hasn’t gained much traction in Congress.
Obama’s new stimulus plan of old ideas seems more like election rhetoric aimed to appeal to voting blocs — veterans, struggling homeowners, green energy, and small businesses. Let’s hope they see through his tired, unpopular ideas.
